An emergent exploration of critical instructional design.

Portfolio Part: 0.7 out of 5.0 on Rate My Professors

Workbook Page: Digital Submission

#wronganswersonly

0.7 out of 5.0 on Rate My Professors

In the space below, brainstorm the MOST restrictive, oppressive course policies you can imagine. You can choose to frame these around a course you teach, or you can just come up with a list that could apply to any courses. Be as heavy-handed and authoritarian as you like; it’s okay if the rules you write make you uncomfortable.

Oppressive Course Policies

Attendance: Attendance is mandatory. Each missed class deducts 5% off of your final grade. No excused absence, unless you have a note from the E.R. or the morgue. Homework: Reading 50-100 pages per class, with a 5-page essay summary response. Absolutely no late work allowed. Each late assignment counts as a zero. Quizzes and Exams: There will be daily quizzes and exams every 3 weeks. No makeup quizzes or exams. You will receive a zero for all missed work. Plagiarism: You will receive an automatic zero on the assignment for any intentional or unintentional plagiarism. It is up to you to catch all instances. Classroom etiquette: No talking in class, except during designate question periods. I will randomly call on students to answer questions; be ready. Incorrect answers will result in point deductions. Office hour visits are to be kept as brief as possible. Get to the point quickly and don’t ask dumb questions. Expectations: You should spend at least 3-4 hours of time studying for this class, per 1 hour in class. Since this is a 4-credit course, I expect about 16 hours of outside course work per week.

Oppressive Course Policies Reflection

I was really looking forward to this activity. Something in me felt kinda “devilish” to give it a try. Like it’d be a lot of fun to write a super nasty course policy. I actually found it to be a little more difficult to write than I thought. And instead of being immensely imaginative, I found myself suggesting course material and approaches that are not so far outside of other courses I’ve actually experienced or heard about. I thought there would be a lot more ways that I could be a serious “ass,” but it turns out it kept coming down to a few general rigidities. Which is actually encouraging, in a way; it means that if we can find a way to help soften the hearts of instructors in a small handful of categories, that could make huge differences in course policies.

Referring back to the rules you wrote, now write the OPPOSITE of each of them in the space below. Reframe each rule by imagining what it would be if you tried to completely counteract its purpose.

Rewritten Course Policies

Attendance: Attendance is optional. My mission, as your instructor, is to make each class completely worth your while to attend. If you attend every class for the semester, I will add 5% to your final grade. Homework: Each week’s reading assignment is carefully crafted to be impactful, but not take too much time or be perceived as busy-work. You will also have some options regarding what level of assignment you attempt. If you need to submit an assignment late, please inform me as soon as you can. I’m happy to be flexible as challenging situations emerge. Read about the Token system for more details. Quizzes and Exams: Short, frequent quizzes will serve as formative assessment, to help you see where are struggling and to help you prepare for exams. There will be longer, comprehensive exams every 3 weeks. If you need to miss a quiz or exam for any reason, please alert me ahead of time so that I can make arrangements for a makeup. Plagiarism: As young writers in an internet age with an infinite amount of resources at your fingertips, it is all too easy to take words from other sources. One of the goals of this course is to help you gain skills in avoiding situations that might lead to plagiarism. Classroom etiquette: Questions are welcomed at all times during class. There will be many opportunities for think-pair-share with your neighbors. Chatting with a peer about class topics is critical for learning. Office hours are a time to clarify and explore the messy process of learning. All questions are welcome. Expectations: I recognize that you have 3-4 other courses outside this one, and possibly a job, family, sport, etc. My goal is for you to feel that the work in this course is worthwhile, but not unnecessarily time consuming.

Rewritten Course Policies Reflection

About 6 or 7 years ago, I would say that my policies were somewhere in between the two extremes I’ve written about. When I first started teaching about 15 years ago, I was already beginning to move away from the “3 big exams is 90% of the grade” model. I was introducing more quizzes and shorter exams, and making homework count for more. But I don’t think I was very flexible in my policies. And I have my fair share of final grades that I regret handing out; D’s that may have unnecessarily held a student back and B+’s for a student who really should have had that moral accomplishment of an A-. Around 2018, as I shifted out of my first long-ish term teaching post of 8 years, and moved into a variety of different teaching settings, I began to relax a little bit. I definitely tried to “control” things more in my early years; maybe it was a sign of feeling young, of trying to earn respect from my elders, and making sure that the students knew I was serious business despite my fun-loving nature in class. I think that years of “rigidity” started to feel … pointless. What was it all about? Why did I do that? I’d been interested in education research for many years, but it was all centered on “students learning physics better.” At some point, I kinda stopped caring that they learned it “better.” I want, instead, for students to care about learning at all. How could I make it relevant to them. As I started to make that shift towards “teaching for my students,” course policies and grading schemes began to shift. I was less interested in physics education research and more interested in learning what makes a better classroom. The pandemic, of course, accelerated the learning curve. My course policies, now, aren’t too far from the rewritten version, here. I sometimes wonder: “Am I too loosey goosey, fluffy wuffy?” And then I hear from my students about the class they go off to next. I hear about the rigid policies, the firm expectations, the “mean” overtones carried in the messages (and I’ve talked to this faculty member myself and heard it firsthand). And when I hear that — I realize that it’s just fine to blaze my trail on the other end of the spectrum now. That old approach didn’t make the world a better place — it had it’s chance. Time for something new.

Reflect upon the experience of writing both sets. How did writing these rules make you feel? How were the two experiences different? In your own courses, are your policies more like one set or the other? Put yourself in the shoes of a student again, and re-read the rules. How do they feel now?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments