In the space below, brainstorm the MOST restrictive, oppressive course policies you can imagine. You can choose to frame these around a course you teach, or you can just come up with a list that could apply to any courses. Be as heavy-handed and authoritarian as you like; it’s okay if the rules you write make you uncomfortable.
These are mostly a “joke” to me now, but most of these policies were in operation to some degree in many of my courses at some point in my career, and I don’t think ANY of them are foreign to students these days. Many faculty– and likely many students– would not consider these “oppressive.” I think it’s worth really thinking about that word, because I *do* find them oppressive for students. I think they quite literally press students down, curb their agency, reduce their power, and limit their humanity– all of which impedes learning.
Referring back to the rules you wrote, now write the OPPOSITE of each of them in the space below. Reframe each rule by imagining what it would be if you tried to completely counteract its purpose.
So yes, I would be comfortable with most of these policies exactly as written here, but if I were creating a syllabus, it’s likely that I would NOT include them like this without getting feedback from students. I know MANY students prefer flexible deadlines–but deadlines nonetheless. And NO attendance policy is something that many students have told me can make it harder for them to succeed in class. So I think a lot of this stuff needs some middle-ground areas, but best to leave that negotiation to students who know best what structures and freedoms help them learn.
Reflect upon the experience of writing both sets. How did writing these rules make you feel? How were the two experiences different? In your own courses, are your policies more like one set or the other? Put yourself in the shoes of a student again, and re-read the rules. How do they feel now?